2002 was an average Arctic year 9 years ago. The arctic ice extent was lower than the average for the 1979-2000 period, but it wasn't a particularly deep melt. Since then, the arctic ice death spiral has accelerated and 2007 made big news for a massive drop in the summer arctic ice minimum. So far this year, the news is even worse, for July 11, the area covered by ice has never been lower in recorded history. The attached maps make the difference between 2002 and 2011 dramatically apparent: http://i713.photobucket.com/albums/ww133/SanePerson/ArcticIce7-11-2002vs_2011.jpg





What a difference 9 years makes.
Sounds pretty scary Tim. You do know that 'recorded history' for ice extent started in 1979 right? Did you know there's another spot on earth where ice extent records are being broken?
I'm aware of Antarctic ice extent and the fact that the overall amount of anarctic ice is in decline. I'm also aware that projections made by climate scientists who work in this area predicted the higher sensitivity of aractic ice than antarctic ice to global warming.
I'm curious - (a) if the summer extent of arctic ice drops to zero in the next 10 - 20 years, (b) the global number of new highs continues to outpace new lows by a ratio of 2:1 or more for another 10-15 years, will you admit you were wrong? How much and what kind of evidence will it take for you? After all, you are the same person who not so long ago wrote that "While man certainly contributes to climate change on a regional scale (heat islands), I doubt we have the ability to change climate in any measurable way on a global scale." As argumentative quality goes, that's basically an ape throwing feces.
nice