Links With Your Coffee - Friday

- DIRECT eNewsletter for Democrats
Always worth a read
- Op-Ed Contributor - A Recount in Minnesota’s Too-Close-To-Call Senate Race Is Futile. - NYTimes.com
- Classical Bookworm: The Grinch Who Stole Democracy
I awoke this morning to the disappointing but expected news that the Prime Minister of Canada had suspended parliament to avoid a confidence vote that would have ended his reign and replaced his government with a coalition of opposition parties. You see we have a minority Conservative government that desperately wants to be a majority. Earlier in the fall, after only two years in power, they called a quickie election (only 5 weeks of campaigning) in a cynical attempt to win a majority of the seats in parliament, but we got pretty much the same result as before, at great taxpayer expense.
- God Spam: Losing My Religion: Charlie Kaufman
- Procrastinating Again? How to Kick the Habit: Scientific American
- Conversational Reading: Newspaper Science Coverage in Decline
- UNDERNEWS: OBAMALAND
- Man of Fetters: A Critic at Large: The New Yorker
- /Mind: In Memoriam, H.M.
Those of you who are students of Psychology or Neuroscience are surely aware of H.M., a patient known only by those initials, who incurred significant memory impairment as the result of an experimental brain surgery performed in 1953. H.M., now revealed as Henry G. Molaison, passed away this week at the age of 83, leaving behind his enormous, if unplanned, contribution to the field of brain research and neuropsychology.
(tip to Patrick) - YouTube - "Christmas Is Pain" by Roy Zimmerman
- xkcd - A Webcomic - Alternate Currency



Comments
Concerning the too-close-to-call Coleman-Franken race. Seife concludes that given the unavoidable error magnitude in any fairly conducted election, it should be considered to be a statistical tie. Even if the vote total shows one candidate ahead, the lead will be much less than the margin of error in the process. He then says that in case of a tie, Minnesota law provides for the winner to be determined by the flip of a coin. But then, if the winner is determined by a margin much less than the margin of error (and the error is random), isn't that just the same as if it had been determined by a coin flip - entirely a matter of chance?
I think federal law would take precedent and the decision would be made by a vote of the Senate
Also, there isn't really an error rate in a hand recount.
Thanks for "Christmas Is Pain" by Roy Zimmerman and co. Made my day.
Post a comment