Commenting Policy
note: non-authenticated comments are moderated, you can avoid the delay by registering.
Robinson on:
Progressivism-Is-Cancer
Robinson on:
God Given Healthcare
omarakavinnie on:
Links With Your Coffee - Sunday
pedantsareus on:
Links With Your Coffee - Friday
leftbanker on:
Healthcare Rally in Utah
jonathan becker on:
Links With Your Coffee - Thursday
Andyo on:
Jude Law
Jaunt on:
In Dodd We Trust
Cosy on:
The War on Facts
inwit on:
Happy St Patty's
Tim on:
Health-Con1 - The Mediscarening
Robinson on:
The 'Life of Brian' Debate
RedSeven on:
"Now, am I advising people to leave their church? Yes!"- Glen Beck
jillbryant2003 on:
Capitalism 101
RedSeven on:
Links With Your Coffee - Tuesday
jillbryant2003 on:
The Low Anthem - Charlie Darwin (music video)
Syngas on:
Slaughter Rule
schparrow on:
It's Pet Peeve Week!
jonathan becker on:
Becker's Bible Basics
RedSeven on:
Rube Goldberg
Syngas on:
Be the Match
RedSeven on:
Placebo Effect Getting Stronger
bugjah on:
What are Syngas's beliefs on climate change
gypsy sister on:
Trouble in Euroland
Powered by Movable Type Pro
Copyright © 2002-2010 Norman Jenson
Comments
Ugh. Famed gossip columnist "Wonkette" versus random 20-something no-name. This is "substance"?
thanks for the vid! Was having trouble sleeping lately, but did the trick! yawn... (=.=)ZZzzz
Where is the media bias? All anyone is trying to do is paint Obama's decision not to support the surge as horrible. Why isn't he pointing out the fact that we never should have been in Iraq in the first place? He is the only voice that would be credible saying this and it would resonate with voters.
How many historical revisionists can dance on the head of a pin?
Obama has side-stepped this issue because, like most of the things leveled at him, it's all smoke.
The "Surge" was NOT presented to us or to Congress as a delicate orchestration of tribal bribery, negotiation with people the administration had previously categorized as Terrorists in coordination with a Sunni Awakening and the success of local Iraqi programs of ethnic cleansing.
The "Surge" was a localized, limited, temporary, and frankly desperate increase in troops intended to stabilize Bagdad and as described would have had little effect and zero lasting effect.
Those other factors listed above have accomplished far more than the "Surge" could have, or frankly, was expected to. And all of it is fueled by the growing expectation that we are going to leave. Without that looming reality, which a few delusional Hawks would like to derail, the complexion of the occupation would be much different today.
But just as the rational for the Invasion has been changed over and over again to obscure it's failures, the "Surge" is being re-defined to try to take credit for accidental success. Anyone who thinks the Bush administration are responsible for planning this, anymore than they were able to foresee the potential consequences of a Hurricane, hasn't been paying attention.
fp
fp
So long-winded I even sign my posts twice.
Sheesh.
Well put, fp.
The way this is being spun by the media shows how little even our journalists understand about basic current foreign policy in Iraq.
Once again, FOX "news stories" dominate the political dialogue.
When and where has everybody decided that the surge was a success???
The dumbshit American MSM that drives the views of some 70 percent of Americans.
Post a comment