links for 2007-04-14
-
Many onegoodmove readers are also bloggers, matt is one of them.
del.icio.us
reddit
Newsvine
FaceBook
« Bill Maher - New Rules | Main | links for 2007-04-15 »
del.icio.us
reddit
Newsvine
FaceBook
Books I'm currently reading, have recently read, or which can be found on my must-read-soon stack.
All purchases made at Amazon through these links contribute to support this site. Thanks for your help.
Powered by Movable Type Personal
Copyright © 2002-2008 Norman Jenson
Commenting Policy
note: non-authenticated comments are moderated, you can avoid the delay by registering.
RedSeven on:
Thinking About November - Krugman
elliotS on:
The Next President
Brett on:
The Sunday Funnies
RedSeven on:
Links With Your Coffee - Sunday
Jack LesCamela on:
No Official Endorsements, But . . .
RedSeven on:
Hillary or Barack Most Progressive
dende blogger on:
Links With Your Coffee - Saturday
jillbryant2003 on:
John McCain - Daily Show
Dzwonka on:
Links With Your Coffee - Thursday
Brian Donohue on:
Links With Your Coffee - Friday
Dzwonka on:
Links With Your Coffee - Wednesday
Evolution on:
Michelle Obama Takes The Low Road
RedSeven on:
The Worst Person
Hansrudolf Suter on:
Bill Moyers - Essay on Reverend Wright
dende blogger on:
Links With Your Coffee - Tuesday
Comments
Have you heard of Tumblelogs?
Similar to the lists you have here but also includes quotes, pics, videos all in a dramatically appealing format...
Z
Posted by: ZuDfunck esq.
|
April 14, 2007 7:53 AM
Re: Abstinence Classeds
They must be doing something right because teen pregnancy is way down.
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hestat/prelimbirths05_tables.pdf#2
Posted by: Syngas
|
April 14, 2007 8:56 AM
Syngas, where in that set of tables does it contrast teen pregnancy between 2001 and now? I may have missed it, but all I saw was the difference between 1991 and 2004, and between 2004 and '05. Sure it's down since '91, I would guess since people have become much more aware of HIV.
Posted by: Colin
|
April 14, 2007 11:44 AM
http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/2006/09/12/USTPstats.pdf
The pregnancy rate reached an all-time high in 1990, during George Bush Sr's administration. It has been decreasing since then.
Posted by: Jo Ann | April 14, 2007 12:03 PM
Check out this table of births per 1000 females aged 15 - 19. http://www.unicef.org/pon98/
Every single European country has significantly fewer pregnancies than the United States.
For example: U.S. 60 Switzerland 4 France 8 Germany 13
Hell, there are even fewer teenage births per 1000 teenagers in Rwanda!
Posted by: Jo Ann | April 14, 2007 12:10 PM
Colin,
The stats for previous years are all available here:
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/hus.htm
I don't really care why teen pregnancy rates are down, I'm just glad they are down.
Jo Ann - I don't understand why you are so bitter toward me lately. What did I say that was so offensive?
Posted by: Syngas | April 14, 2007 12:18 PM
Jo Ann - I don't understand why you are so bitter toward me lately. What did I say that was so offensive?
Wow...You care how I feel about you?
Sorry if I'm coming across as bitter. I'm just responding to what you say. I'll work on my manners and try to be more delicate in the future!
Well, it's a beautiful sunny day and I need to get out and enjoy my garden.
Warm wishes to you Syngas. ;)
Posted by: Jo Ann | April 14, 2007 12:33 PM
Awww! Group hug! ^_^
Posted by: Frenetic | April 14, 2007 2:09 PM
You say now that you don't care why they're down, yet just mere hours ago you suggested that they were down because of abstinence only sex "education". Given that the effect of education on pregnancy is almost certainly mediated by actually having sex, and given the data showing that abstinence only sex education does not reduce the onset of sexual activity, it becomes very hard to argue that abstinence only "education" has the effect of reducing pregnancy.
Admittedly, there are two ways you could conceivably argue that: one, although refraining from teaching kids about safe sex practices doesn't discourage them from having sex in general, it somehow makes them more likely to practice safe sex. I don't have numbers at my fingertips but I strongly suspect that the reverse is true if anything. Second, although the age of first sexual activity is unchanged, the lack of knowledge about safe sex practices leads to less frequent sex after the first time. Again, difficult to see why that would be true, but please, show us the numbers if you've got 'em.
I, too, am very glad that teen pregnancy is down since 1991, but it's almost certainly in spite of the failure to teach kids about safe sex, not because of it.
Posted by: Colin
|
April 14, 2007 3:52 PM
"Fuck a lot of women, kid. Not one woman. A lot of women. Are you getting any? You can tell me. Are you getting any? No?! Jesus, you're what, 15? You should be getting that young stuff -- that stuff is the best in the whole world. She's jailbait, you're jailbat -- it's perfect! You turn 18, that's three to five! Fuck a lot of women kid. I've got no reason to lie to you."
Posted by: Dzwonka
|
April 14, 2007 5:38 PM
Little Miss Sunshine?
Posted by: Syngas
|
April 14, 2007 6:29 PM
"You say now that you don't care why they're down, yet just mere hours ago you suggested that they were down because of abstinence only sex "education"."
I did not. I said they must be doing something right. You bore me.
Posted by: Syngas
|
April 14, 2007 8:29 PM
I see, so your comment was utterly irrelevant to the article then. Citing random statistics without any claims about how they relate to a topic is always a good form of argument. As is the assertion that someone who disagrees with you "bores you". Perhaps watching Teletubbies, with all the pretty colors and moving shapes, would be better stimulation for you. It's obvious your attention span isn't well suited to talk with the big kids.
Posted by: Colin
|
April 14, 2007 8:40 PM
This study only varifies what other studies have indicated. Abstinence Only miseducation has the opposite of the desired effect.
Compare all the stats between the US and countries with established comprehensive sex education programs. Canada, the Netherlands are good starting points for comparison. The Netherlands have had comprehensive sex ed for a very long time, Canada' program is much younger, compare the three then look further afield.
Abstinence Only 'graduates' start sexual activity earlier that those armed with comprehensive sex ed. Have more teen pregnances, more babies out of wed lock, and higher rates of stds and hiv among teens. The notable exception being clymidia which is more common among European teens.
Still the White House wants us to avoid "sweeping conclusions".
The only sweeping I see is the truth being swept under the rug by the president and his evangelical buddies.
The Abstinence Only programs are utterly fraudulent,a pay off for political support. The real world cost of the destruction of comprehensive sexual education in America will not be known but it is born by the young.
To these Republican Christians the youth of America are just future cannon fodder and tithe payers. Keeping them in line is much more important than their health and safety.
Posted by: ThomasMcCay | April 15, 2007 1:30 AM
Thanks Thomas,
You seem well informed on this subject. Do you have an explanation for why teen pregnancy rates have dropped so dramatically over the last 15 years?
Posted by: Syngas
|
April 15, 2007 6:44 AM
Frenetic, Group hug..lol
Syngas, Do you have an explanation for why teen pregancies are significantly higher in the U.S. than any other European country? (Jo Ann asked as gently as she could)
Posted by: Jo Ann | April 15, 2007 7:09 AM
Sure Jo Ann,
We're dumber
Posted by: Syngas
|
April 15, 2007 7:21 AM
The Swedes blame cell phones for sterility and teens in the US are constantly using cell phones. Check out the last couple paragraphs of this story:
http://news.independent.co.uk/environment/wildlife/article2449968.ece
I don't really believe this but thought it was funny. I carry my cell phone in my pants pocket so I guess I can pass on the vascetomy!
Posted by: Syngas
|
April 15, 2007 7:25 AM
Oops, I should have credited the Indians for that study, not the Swedes. I beg your forgiveness.
Posted by: Syngas
|
April 15, 2007 8:37 AM
Equally alarming, blue-chip Swedish research revealed that radiation from mobile phones killed off brain cells, suggesting that today's teenagers could go senile in the prime of their lives.
Studies in India and the US have raised the possibility that men who use mobile phones heavily have reduced sperm counts
Hmmm.. what are the men doing with those cell phones? Or are they trying to say that men think with their penises?
Posted by: Jo Ann | April 15, 2007 9:13 AM
"Or are they trying to say that men think with their penises?"
Was there ever any doubt?
Posted by: Syngas
|
April 15, 2007 9:24 AM
Less sex or increased use of contraception or a decrease in fertility, or some combination of the above.
Posted by: Norm | April 15, 2007 10:33 AM
agreed!
Posted by: Syngas
|
April 15, 2007 10:46 AM
I've suggested the drop is because, since people have become aware of HIV, etc., they are more likely to use contraception. Don't know if that's true, but the time frame seems to fit.
Posted by: Colin
|
April 15, 2007 11:15 AM
I believe the awareness of HIV and the increased use of condoms is a large factor in the said birth decline among teens.
Condoms are now advertised on TV and elsewhere so the availability goes up, the stigma sometimes involved in purchasing them has gone down considerably.
It is also true that kids who have only had abstinence only garbage fed to them are less likely to use condoms when they first become sexually active. Because worth while information regarding protection is not part of abstinence only programs.
The nice Christian folks who often run these programs think it is dangerous to arm kids with such real world information. Information that might proctect them from disease and unwanted pregnancies when they do what they are going to do. As mentioned before, kids with abstinence only programs tend to begin sexual activity earlier than kids with comprehensive sex ed. So the abstinence only kids start a bit earlier and are less likely to use protection. But let's not make any sweeping conclusions.
In deed, American teens have a higher pregnancy rate than Europeans because they are less informed. They are less informed because their government has betrayed them with counterfiet education. For political reasons. A bloody pay off for political support. where is the morality in that? where is the evangelical jesus in all of this?
Posted by: ThomasMcCay | April 16, 2007 5:40 AM
As long as all we're going to offer is our best guess, I'm going to credit the internet.
The girls on the internet don't have pimples, their dads aren't going to kick your ass, you don't have to buy them stuff, they won't break your heart, they don't care how big your unit is, they won't say 'no', they can't give you VD and you can't get them pregnant. For a teenage boy, it doesn't get much better!
Next time you go to the local mall, take note of the boy/girl ratio of the teens hanging out there. In the 80's it was pretty even (I was one of them).
Don't get me wrong, I don't think all the new porn is a good thing for young minds to be exposed to but I'll give credit where credit is due.
Posted by: Syngas
|
April 16, 2007 6:39 AM
There is more than guess work involved. The increased acceptability and use of condoms is well noted in the literature on the subject. But of course trolls don't bother to learn anything they just shoot their mouths off for attention while pretending their ignorance is hidden behind glib meaningless retorts.
Posted by: ThomasMcCay | April 16, 2007 7:12 PM
Thanks for providing all that literature tom. I guess I'm not the only one shooting my mouth off. you people suck
Posted by: Syngas
|
April 16, 2007 11:29 PM
Well troll, it isn't up to me to educate someone who is just making meaningless noise. It's been a couple of years since I researched and wrote on the subject. I can find links to what I've written but you're stranger than I thought if you think I'm going to dig up all those strands of research for a troll who reads little, understands less, and makes empty arguments based on nothing but clever wit and a very small talent for misdirection. A small talent.
They have these things called libraries where you can find books and professional journals on just about everything. Check it out, spend a couple of years there. It will do you a lot of good.
A steady diet of entertainment news and internet forums clogs the brain with garbage leaving you with nothing worth while to say and no ability to stop saying it.
Posted by: ThomasMcCay | April 17, 2007 3:32 AM
Post a comment