Quantum interrogation
What a great teacher, who would have believed you could explain this in a way I could understand. Wow!
Quantum interrogation | Cosmic Variance
Quantum interrogation
Quantum mechanics, as we all know, is weird. It’s weird enough in its own right, but when some determined experimenters do tricks that really bring out the weirdness in all its glory, and the results are conveyed to us by well-intentioned but occasionally murky vulgarizations in the popular press, it can seem even weirder than usual.
Last week was a classic example: the computer that could figure out the answer without actually doing a calculation! (See Uncertain Principles, Crooked Timber, 3 Quarks Daily.) The articles refer to an experiment performed by Onur Hosten and collaborators in Paul Kwiat’s group at Urbana-Champaign, involving an ingenious series of quantum-mechanical miracles. On the surface, these results seem nearly impossible to make sense of. (Indeed, Brad DeLong has nearly given up hope.) How can you get an answer without doing a calculation? Half of the problem is that imprecise language makes the experiment seem even more fantastical than it really is — the other half is that it really is quite astonishing.
Let me make a stab at explaining, perhaps not the entire exercise in quantum computation, but at least the most surprising part of the whole story — how you can detect something without actually looking at it.
(Via 3QD.)




Comments
...well-intentioned but occasionally murky vulgarizations ...imprecise language...
Indeed. These are always the problems with science news, espescially developments in quantum theory, conveyed to readers by the press.
The puppy in the box is a clever rewording of the infamous "Schrödinger's cat" thought experiment. fyi.
Post a comment