This comment pretty much summarizes the objection the Warbloggers have to this Tom Tomorrow Cartoon.

but in fact, the recognition that there were "warbloggers" who served in the military was--and still is--lacking from the ... cartoon.&mdash Pejmanesque

I'm not sure this warblogger has even read the cartoon. If he did, his body ravaged by an adrenlin rush triggered by this dastardly attack on him and his, rendered his reading and comprehension skills inactive. The cartoon doesn't even generalize to all warbloggers, the cartoon tells the story of one specific chickenhawk blogger that is felled by carpal tunnel syndrome, and his comrades ( definition - one that shares the same fortunes or experiences as another) namely other chickenhawks, take his place. There is no need to recognize that there are warbloggers that served in the military. The cartoon is only talking about the subset of warbloggers that are chickenhawks, and if that's not enough the definition of chickenhawk necessairly precludes service in the military. How much clearer could it possibly be. The obvious question is what kind of life would these fucking idiots, those making this argument, have if they couldn't create a daily outrage based not on facts, but on a pathetic need for attention.

Tom writes,But that nonexistent cartoon, the one in which I disrespect veterans—that’s the one all the chickenbloggers will be discussing now, you can count on it. Tempest in a Teapot