Night of The Living Dead
Reprinted from Yellow Times
By John Chuckman
YellowTimes.org Columnist (Canada)
(YellowTimes.org) – One by one, in the dead of night, they push ghastly, rotting fingers through dank earth in an effort to grasp something solid and pull themselves up from moldering graves, figures of long-dead flesh, blank-eyed, capable of no feeling save an unnatural hunger that animates and drives them shakily forward. They are the gruesome remains of an earlier time, mysteriously returned to life, once more to exercise their malevolent influence on the planet. They are the Bush appointments -- Cheney, Rumsfeld, Reich, and Poindexter.
And now we have the decayed bulk of Henry Kissinger again lurching into Washington.
Kissinger has been reanimated and assigned to study the causes of what he himself helped create, terrorism.
Well, you might say, if police can use a skillful, lifelong criminal to understand a crime, as they often do, why not use a grotesque monster to understand monstrous events?
Kissinger will studiously avoid examining the genuine causes of terror. These are things the United States does not want to hear, and they are the kinds of things he is an old hand at deftly hiding. The clue to Mr. Kissinger's actual task is contained in the words of the soulless husk now inhabiting the White House when he noted that he and the seventy-nine year-old war criminal and pathological liar "share the same commitments."
Anyone who has studied Kissinger's career understands that his total commitment has been to personal advancement, always and everywhere at the expense of others, and the path of his advancement has followed the American establishment's insatiable lust to control its external environment, swarming as it does with the awkward wants and needs of billions of other human beings.
He has frequently taken America down to failure and disgrace -- the greatest example being the disgusting holocaust in Vietnam -- precisely because the goals of the people he serves are encrusted with ignorance and arrogance about the world. But if you serve the cause of the American imperium with adequate zeal, a considerable allowance is made for failure, and, generally, you still are rewarded.
You are rewarded because the establishment does not want to examine its motives, its assumptions, or its ignorance following on failures. It cares only that its urges are acted upon immediately as they are made known and with all the force it is possible to summon. Besides, most failures are of no great consequence since they involve mainly the broken bodies of others -- Vietnamese, Cubans, Chileans, Kurds, Iraqis, Iranians, Palestinians, Central Americans, and, of course, the no-account mass of ordinary Americans -- so who cares?
Kissinger's lifelong task has been to extract the liquids, including huge volumes of blood, from America's imperial detritus and convince the world in a gravelly, authoritative baritone, with earnest, over-the-glasses looks, that he has distilled a wondrous elixir for the benefit of humanity.
And he has been a remarkable success, perhaps the most energetic and amoral character since Talleyrand, the utterly-corrupt Catholic bishop who served every government of France from revolutionary to imperial to re-installed royalty as a statesman with equal indifference to principle and equal capacity for foul and self-aggrandizing tricks. Talleyrand died, of course, a fabulously wealthy and much decorated figure.
As readers know, I enjoy poking fun at the more inept qualities of Mr. Bush, always in the desperate hope that Mark Twain was right when he wrote that nothing withstands the assault of laughter. But the truth is, in dark private moments, I am inclined to agree with Mark Miller who has observed that Bush's speech and gestures are better explained by a personality disorder than a lack of intelligence. The disorder his study suggests is a degree of sociopathy. How else do you explain shared commitments with a monster?
[John Chuckman is former chief economist for a large Canadian oil company. He has many interests and is a lifelong student of history. He writes with a passionate desire for honesty, the rule of reason, and concern for human decency. He is a member of no political party and takes exception to what has been called America's "culture of complaint" with its habit of reducing every important issue to an unproductive argument between two simplistically defined groups. John regards it as a badge of honor to have left the United States as a poor young man from the South Side of Chicago when the country embarked on the pointless murder of something like three million Vietnamese in their own land because they happened to embrace the wrong economic loyalties. He lives in Canada, which he is fond of calling "the peaceable kingdom."]
John Chuckman encourages your comments: jchuckman@YellowTimes.org
YellowTimes.org is an international news and opinion publication. YellowTimes.org encourages its material to be reproduced, reprinted, or broadcast provided that any such reproduction identifies the original source, http://www.YellowTimes.org. Internet web links to http://www.YellowTimes.org are appreciated. YellowTimes.org is an international news and opinion publication. YellowTimes.org encourages its material to be reproduced, reprinted, or broadcast provided that any such reproduction identifies the original source, http://www.YellowTimes.org. Internet web links to http://www.YellowTimes.org are appreciated.


Comments
I'm fascinated by how much criticism of America comes from Canada. Jak made (and will most likely make again) a whole blog on how wrong the United States is all the time in every instance. Writers from Canada appear regularly in the yellow times. I know a woman who writes one negative thing about the United States in her blog on a daily basis just for shits and giggles.
I ask this question, totally tongue-in-cheek: Don't the people of Canada have anything going on in Canada that warrants any attention?
I've noticed it as well. I think it is the result of two main factors. The United States and its policies have a significant impact on Canadians hence their interest in our country. The second factor is that both you and I are attracted to political blogs so the fact we see so much of it has more to do with the fact that we are constantly looking for it. Seek and ye shall find. There is plenty of non-political stuff written by Canadians about Canad we just don't seek it out. We are simply not interested.
The following revealing item on Henry Kissinger is extracted from an article from the 'New World Order Intelligence Update' [http://www.nwointelligence.com/NEWWORLD.HTM]:
'And, fellow-Canadians, as a faint echo of the freedoms we have now lost in this once great Dominion, here's a robust exercise of free speech, fresh from the Mother Country, which is now impossible to imagine in modern Canada!
[Henry Kissinger walks out on Paxman radio program in the U.K. after being asked, among other things, if he felt "like a fraud." Exchange below, as reported by THE GUARDIAN, 29th June, 1999]
Jeremy Paxman: "It's been 17 years since the last volume of your memoirs. You said you wanted to let the dust settle but [didn't you] need the distance in order to rewrite history?"
Dr Kissinger: "No I based these memoirs on documents which were as valid then as they are now."
Paxman: [describes Kissinger's claim that he ended the cold war as "farfetched"] "What bothers a lot of people is you seem to ignore the human rights of people within regimes with which you're trying to establish a balance of power."
Kissinger: "That's not correct either."
Paxman: question about supporting General Pinochet and undermining President Allende in Chile.
Kissinger: "We did not support Pinochet. In what way did we support Pinochet?"
Paxman: "You supported the military regime."
Kissinger: "After the coup we preferred Pinochet to Allende."
Paxman: "It doesn't stop there... You're on record justifying the [behaviour of the] Chinese government in Tiananmen Square."
Kissinger:... "I have never supported what the Chinese did in Tiananmen Square."
Paxman: "Did you feel a fraud for accepting the Nobel Prize [for the Indo-China agreement]?"
Kissinger: "I wonder what you do when you do a hostile interview?"
Paxman: [accuses Kissinger of a "wilful misreading of history"]
Kissinger: "It may be a misreading but it wasn't wilful."
Paxman: question about the "hundreds of thousands of people killed in the bombing of Cambodia".
Kissinger: "That's absolutely untrue. We have no evidence that hundreds of thousands of people were killed... I think this is an absolute outrage, it's nonsense."
Paxman: "You don't deny [the bombing of Cambodia] was secret though?... This was a secret operation against a neutral country..."
Kissinger: "Come on now, Mr Paxman, this was 15 years ago, and you at least have the ability to educate yourself about a lie on your own programme... "
Paxman: "What's factually inaccurate?"
Kissinger: "... That's outrageous... " [Kissinger abruptly leaves: Paxman calls out, "'Bye, Dr. Kissinger"!]'
If you're interested in the ramifications of the coming 'New World Order', see the excellent NWO site at http://www.nwointelligence.com.
You'll also find a superb archive of articles on the New World Order [which is impacting and changing us all increasingly] from the 'New World Order Intelligence Update', at http://www.rarehistorybooks.com/NWOCONSP.HTM. They are also mirrored at http://www.survivalistskills.com/NWODICT.HTM and at http://www.torontochristianbooks.com/NWOGOV.HTM. Well worth reading!